top of page

The Female Equivalent of Chivalry Isn't a Gesture. It's a Surrender

Sep 10
7 min read

I posted a question in the Singles in PDX group a while back. Simple one. Are there any chivalrous men left in Portland, Oregon. I wasn't trying to start anything, I was genuinely asking, because I'd been striking out and wanted to know if I was chasing a myth or if the good ones were just hiding.


A man asked me a question back in the comments that I haven't stopped chewing on since. He said: if women want chivalry, what's the female version of it? What are we supposed to be doing back?
Konrad von Limpurg as a knight being armed by his lady in the Codex Manesse (early 14th century)
Konrad von Limpurg as a knight being armed by his lady in the Codex Manesse (early 14th century)

I want to be clear about who asked, because it matters. This wasn't a woman getting defensive about pulling her weight. This was a man, genuinely asking what he gets in return for the effort. That's not a gotcha question. That's a man wanting to know the investment goes both ways before he keeps making it. Respect that.


I want chivalry. I'll say that upfront and not apologize for it. Open the door. Walk on the traffic side of the sidewalk. Text me you got home safe even though I'm the one who left first. As a single mom who does every single thing herself, from the garbage cans to the school forms to the emotional weight of an entire household, chivalry isn't outdated to me. It's rest. It's someone else carrying something for five minutes so my arms can drop.


I got spoiled on this in the South. I lived in New Orleans for years, and down there chivalry isn't a nice-to-have, it's basically mandated. A man opens your door not because he read it in a book somewhere, but because his mama or his granny raised him, and God help him if word ever got back to her that he didn't. That's not romance, that's fear of Sunday dinner. It's baked into the culture so deep that men don't even clock it as effort. It's just what you do, whew, because your granny will know.


Portland does not run on that rule. Nobody's granny is checking up here. So before I answered him, I actually looked into where this whole thing came from, because I wanted to know if I was defending something real or just something I liked.


Turns out chivalry has a real birth certificate. The word comes from the Old French "chevalerie," which comes from "cheval," meaning horse. It started as a description of horsemanship, the skill it took to fight on horseback, before it ever meant a man being polite to a woman. By the 12th century it had grown into an actual code for knights, and here's the part people skip: it wasn't invented because men were naturally noble. It was invented because they weren't.


Medieval knights were armed men trained for violence, and left unchecked they tore through towns, took what they wanted, and answered to nobody. The Church stepped in and built chivalry as a leash. Protect the weak. Protect women. Protect the church. Keep your word. Fight fair. It was discipline dressed up as honor, aimed at controlling men who had all the power and none of the accountability.


Then courtly love got folded in, this idea from troubadours that a knight should devote himself to a lady, prove himself worthy of her, serve her without expecting anything handed back. That's the root of the door-opening, the grand gesture, the effort before the reward. It was never really about a woman being fragile. It was about a powerful man choosing restraint and devotion on purpose, because nobody was forcing him to.


I like that history a lot better than the watered down version. Chivalry was never about weak women needing help. It was about strong men choosing not to be dangerous. So I sat with his question, expecting to hand back a tidy little list. Text back. Compliment him. Plan a date. All fine things. None of them the real answer.


Here's the real answer, and it took me a minute to say it out loud because it's not the popular one right now. I'm not just looking for chivalry. I'm looking for a masculine, dominant man, because when I have that, I get to be a genuinely submissive woman, and that is exactly what I like. Not submissive like a doormat. Submissive like a woman who finally gets to put the clipboard down.

I had a date last month where the guy just picked the restaurant. No "where do you want to go," no back and forth text thread, no making me do the emotional labor of choosing so he could stay neutral. He picked, he showed up on time, he drove. Small thing. I noticed my shoulders drop two inches the second I got in his car, and I hadn't even clocked they were up that high. That's the whole thing right there. Not the restaurant. The two inches.


Everybody wants to talk about equality like it means identical. It doesn't. I run my whole life solo. I make every decision for my household, every single day, with nobody to bounce it off of at 11pm when Luka's fever won't break and I'm the only adult in the building. I am the man and the woman of my house right now. I am dominant by necessity, not by nature. So when a man shows up who actually leads, who has a plan, who makes a decision and owns it instead of asking me to make it for him, something in my body exhales. That's not weakness. That's relief. There's a difference.


The female equivalent of chivalry isn't a mirrored gesture. It's surrender. A woman who is fully capable of running the show, choosing to hand a man the wheel anyway, because he's earned enough trust that she doesn't have to hold everything alone for a few hours. That is not small. For a woman who's had to be hard and capable and in charge for four years straight, softness is the most expensive thing I own. Giving it to a man, the version of me nobody else gets, is the whole gift. My trust. My softness. The single mom hustle stays at the door. What walks in is a woman who lets him plan the night without white-knuckling the armrest the whole time.


I know how this sounds to some people. I know "submissive" is a loaded word right now and everybody wants to argue about what it means. I'm not talking about losing myself or shrinking down or letting a man make choices for me that affect my kid or my life. I built this life with my own two hands and I'm not handing the deed to anybody. I'm talking about the difference between a woman who has to be in charge of everything and a woman who gets to choose, in the right relationship, to stop being in charge of everything for a while. That choice only feels good when the man on the other end of it has actually earned the wheel. A weak man asking me to be submissive is asking me to do his job and mine. A strong man earning it gives me somewhere to finally set my load down.

If you're a mom reading this, you already know the part I haven't said outright yet. Motherhood is its own chivalry, and nobody's opening a door for us while we do it. We protect, we provide, we take the hit before it reaches our kids, we go without sleep and without asking anyone's permission. We are, every single day, the strong one making sure someone smaller and more vulnerable gets through it okay. That's the whole code. Protect the weak. Show up even when it costs you. We just never call it chivalry because nobody's clapping and there's no lady in a tower, there's a four year old refusing to wear pants.


So when I say softness is expensive for me, that's why. I've been the strong one in every room for years, including the room with my own kid in it. Wanting a man who can hold some of that weight isn't me being weak or old fashioned. It's me being tired in the specific way only mothers understand, the kind of tired that doesn't show up on a blood test. And I think a lot of moms would say the same thing if they let themselves. We're not asking to be rescued. We're asking for one place in our lives where we don't have to be the one who's rescuing.


There's also this. My son is also watching me. He's five, and he's already clocking how the adults around him treat each other. I don't just want him to grow up chivalrous because his mama or his granny will find out if he isn't. I want him to see, up close, what it looks like when a man earns a woman's trust and she actually gives it to him, instead of a woman who has to stay armored up because nobody's ever proven to her that she can put the armor down. That's a lesson I can't teach him by staying hard forever. I can only teach it by letting the right man show him what safe looks like.


So if you're a man wondering what you get back for opening the door, here it is. You get a woman who stops performing independence around you. You get the parts of her that don't come out for just anyone, because she doesn't trust just anyone to hold them. That's rarer than a text back. That's rarer than a compliment on your car. That's a woman deciding, after years of having to be everything to everyone, that she doesn't have to be that with you.


You don't get a woman who mirrors your effort move for move. You get the one place she stops keeping score.

bottom of page